Putting them on, the ankle collar is soft, no rubbing, which is a huge plus for a low-top. The silhouette is just iconic, you know? A pro here is the everyday comfort and breathability – way better for warm weather than high-tops. A con? The outsole traction is just… fine. It's not terrible, but don't plan on playing serious ball in these. So, who are these for? Anyone looking for a stylish, comfortable summer shoe from the Jordan 1 family. Serious ball players should stick to performance models. First impression of this pair? The 'Chicago' color blocking on the "Jordan 1 Low" just pops on camera. It's a timeless look. On feet, they're lightweight and the leather has a nice sheen. However—and this is key—the insole is pretty basic. You're paying for the name and the legacy of the "Jordan series", not for tech. I'd recommend these to anyone who loves the AJ1 High style but wants a low-profile option. Not for performance basketball, obviously, but for street style? Absolutely worth the $115. Who is this for? Honestly, "almost everyone". If you want a classic, low-profile sneaker that goes with everything, grab the "Air Jordan 1 Low". It's perfect for beginners to the Jordan series, or for collectors who want a comfortable, beater pair. Students, office workers, casual wearers – it's a universal fit. You really can't miss with this silhouette. Alright, so here's my immediate on-feet impression of the Nike Air Jordan 1 Low: super easy to style. I slipped these on and they went with everything – jeans, shorts, you name it. The break-in was minimal, which is great! However, that flat, firm midsole won't be for everyone, especially if you're used to modern, bouncy sneakers. As a style staple, though? It's a 10/10. Just know you're buying into a legend, not a comfort tech showcase.

  • Shown: Navy Velvet
  • Style: DB4612-300

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5