First impression? This 'Shadow' Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid looks super clean — the grey and black color-blocking is just versatile, you know? The leather feels decent for the price point, around $120 USD. On feet, the fit is true to size; it's snug, but the ankle support is — honestly — pretty good for a Mid. Compared to a High, the silhouette is slightly shorter, which I actually prefer for casual wear. Pro? It's a timeless, easy-to-style silhouette from the Jordan series. Con? The cushioning is firm — not the most comfortable for all-day wear right out of the box. I'd recommend it for someone wanting a classic look without the High-top price, but not for folks needing plush comfort immediately. Who should skip it? If you NEED maximum ankle support or that specific, towering High profile – this isn't it. Also, if ultimate, cloud-like comfort is your #1 priority, you might want to look elsewhere within Nike. The "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid" is about style and heritage first, tech second. On foot, the Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid feels exactly how you'd expect: flat and supportive. The ankle collar, honestly, gives a nice secure feel without being restrictive. Comparing it to an AJ1 High, you definitely get more ankle mobility here. The major pro? Its versatility - these go with almost anything in my closet. The potential con? That classic Jordan 1 comfort, or lack thereof... it's not a "squishy" shoe. I'd recommend it for style-first wearers, not for all-day comfort seekers. On the flip side, who might want to skip it? Hardcore sneaker purists who only value OG High cuts and premium materials might dismiss it. Also, if you need "maximum" cushioning for long days on your feet, there are definitely more comfortable modern shoes. The "Jordan 1 Mid" is about style & heritage, not cutting-edge tech.

  • Shown: Chrome
  • Style: 555088-036

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5