You're paying for an icon. The "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid" offers that legendary Jordan Brand style in a super wearable package. It's not trying to be the most advanced shoe; it's trying to be a classic. And it succeeds. For a staple sneaker, the value is definitely there in my opinion. Alright, let's get into these! First off, the box is standard, but the moment you lift the lid – wow. This ‘Classic Black/White/Red’ colorway on the "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid" is just "clean". The leather feels decent for the $125 price point, honestly. The silhouette? Instant classic. It's the iconic look we all love, just in a slightly more wearable, mid-top format. For a first impression, it's a solid win. Alright, so I just got the "new" Air Jordan 1 Mid in the 'Chicago' colorway in hand. First impressions? The build quality is solid—no glue stains or anything. The shape is just... iconic. On foot, the fit is TTS—snug, good lockdown—but the cushioning is firm, a classic AJ1 feel. Compared to the Highs, the silhouette is slightly different, less ankle support. For $125 USD, it's a "fantastic" option if you want that legendary look without the high-top price or hassle. Just know—it’s not a cloud-like comfort shoe! So, I'm lacing up this "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid" in the 'Panda' colorway. First thoughts? The black and white is crisp and clean—great for content. Wearing them, they feel exactly like you’d expect: firm, stable, and flat. They’re not uncomfortable, just… traditional. The Mid height is perfect for showing off your socks, which I love. Advantage: they match literally any fit. Disadvantage: the outsole traction is just okay for anything beyond casual use. At $125 USD, it's a fair deal. Ideal for someone who wants a reliable, stylish beater shoe. Not ideal for performance basketball, obviously.

  • Shown: Red Oreo
  • Style: 378037-003

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5