Just unboxed this pair of "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mids", guys. First impression? The silhouette is "so" classic—it’s that Jordan 1 look we all love. This specific colorway is clean, perfect for daily wear. Pulling them out, the build quality feels solid, no complaints. At around "$125 USD", it's a more accessible entry into the Jordan series, you know? It’s a win for your wallet. So, here's the "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid" "White Shadow" that I just unboxed. My "first" impression? The build quality is "solid" for the price point. Seriously, for $120 USD, it's a great deal. On foot, the ankle collar on this "Jordan 1 Mid" fits me perfectly, offering good support without being restrictive. The main "advantage" over the High? Honestly, it's easier to get on and off! But that's also the "downside" if you "need" the full lockdown of a high-top for hooping. For casual wear, it's a total win. Alright, first up with this "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid" in the "Elephant Print" colorway, which is priced at a cool $120 USD. Straight out of the box, I'm "really" impressed with the leather quality on this one—it's surprisingly soft! Honestly, it feels (and looks) way better than some recent Jordan 1 releases. The iconic silhouette is just a classic. However, just know the "Air unit" in these isn't super plush... it's more about style than "all-day" comfort. If you're new to the Jordan series, this Mid is a fantastic, more affordable starting point. Here’s my real take. The "Air Jordan 1 Mid" is a staple for a reason. It's durable, goes with almost anything in your closet. Is it the most comfortable shoe ever? Nah. The cushioning is basic. But for its price point in the Jordan series, you’re paying for the design and heritage. I’d recommend it to anyone wanting their first pair of Jordans without breaking the bank.

  • Shown: Unc
  • Style: 555088-302

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5