It's the "Chicago Black Toe" version—an absolute icon in the Jordan series, but in a Mid cut. The fit is true to size, but the break-in period? It's a little "stiff" at first, I won't lie. After a few wears, though, it molds nicely. The "pro" is obviously the legendary color-blocking; it goes with literally everything. The con? Don't expect Boost-like cushioning—you're walking on history, not clouds. At $120 USD, it's for sneakerheads who value style over supreme comfort. Let's talk looks on camera. This "Air Jordan 1 Mid" just "pops" in footage. The simple color blocking works so well. Compared to the OG Highs – it's a slightly shorter collar, which I actually prefer for casual fits. It's less bulky around the ankle. The main advantage here? Versatility and that iconic look at a more accessible price. Downside? Purists might always favor the Highs. Opening the box, this "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid" 'Bred' looks sharp. The leather has a nice grain, and the silhouette is, of course, legendary. On feet, they're snug (I went TTS) and feel planted. For YouTube shots? The Mid profile is super flattering on camera. A key "pro" is the vast array of colorways available in the Mid cut versus some harder-to-find Highs. On the flip side, the ankle padding is minimal. So, who are these for? Style-focused folks. Not for comfort-tech seekers. At ~"$120 USD", it's a style investment. Check out this pair! The "'Banned' inspired colorway" on the "Air Jordan 1 Mid" just hits different on camera. Unboxing, the red just pops! On feet, the fit is true to size for me - good lockdown. It's not a heavy shoe, which I appreciate for all-day wear. Honestly, for under "$130", this is a solid pick if you dig the vibe but don't wanna chase High-top resale prices. It's a statement piece, for sure, without being "too" loud.

  • Shown: Gold Hoops
  • Style: 384664-006

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5