First thing I noticed? The bold color contrast — it really stands out. Quality is okay — typical for a Mid-tier Jordan release. Wearing them, the ankle lockdown is secure, though the sole feels flat after a few hours. For photography? These colors are vibrant and graphic — very Instagram-friendly. Against a Jordan 1 High, you lose some of that iconic height, but it's a more low-key vibe. Pro: Strong style impact for the money (~$120 USD). Con: Not the best for comfort or wide feet. Great for fashion-focused folks, but not for comfort-seekers or extended standing. So, who is this for? Honestly, if you're new to sneakers or want a classic that goes with "everything", this is a fantastic start. The design is simpler than some Highs, making it less intimidating to style. If you need max comfort or are into the latest tech fabrics, maybe skip it. But for a versatile, iconic piece? The nike air jordan 1 mid is a strong yes from me. On foot, this specific "Jordan 1 Mid" 'University Blue' just pops on camera. The contrast between the white, black, and that bright blue is so clean & photogenic. It's a timeless look that works with almost any casual fit. Compared to the much pricier Air Jordan 1 Highs, the "Mid" version offers a very similar aesthetic for less – that's a huge "plus" in my book. The main difference? Obviously, the cut is slightly lower around the ankle. Who should "maybe" skip it? Hardcore performance "basketball" players - this is NOT a modern hoop shoe. Also, if you "exclusively" collect OG High-top silhouettes & see the "Mid" as "not the real thing"? You won't be satisfied. And if "ultra-soft", cloud-like comfort is your #1 priority? You might find the feel a bit "dated".

  • Shown: Pollen
  • Style: CT8529-012

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5