Unboxing, the leather feels decent for the price point, you know? Around "$125 USD", it's what you expect. The shape is instantly recognizable - that iconic Jordan 1 silhouette, just a bit shorter than the Highs. On foot, it's a bit stiff at first, honestly, but the ankle support is solid for a mid-top. A great starter sneaker for someone new to the "Jordan series". Final thoughts on this "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid": It's a certified wardrobe workhorse. For around $130, you get a piece of sneaker history with daily-wear practicality. The pros? Iconic looks, durable construction, and killer colorways. The cons? Basic comfort tech and predictable creasing. I'd recommend it to any casual wearer or "Jordan series" fan on a budget. I'd "not" recommend it to performance athletes or anyone seeking plush, all-day cushioning. It does its job well! What's up everyone, so, I just got the classic white-red "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid" in hand. Right out of the box, the leather feels pretty decent for this price point, you know, around $130 USD? The silhouette is just iconic, of course. It's a timeless colorway that goes with literally "anything". Honestly, if you're new to the Jordan series, this is a perfect, affordable place to start your collection. Let's get into it. Sliding on this "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid", the heel lockdown is immediate. The construction feels robust. Visually, it's a timeless design that holds up in any era. I own Highs too, and sometimes I prefer the Mid for its slightly less bulky look around the ankle. "Pros": Durable build, iconic look, great for styling. "Cons": The insole is pretty basic, and they can feel stiff initially. At around $130 USD, it's a fair entry into the Jordan 1 world. I'd recommend them for a first-time Jordan buyer or someone building a versatile rotation.

  • Shown: Space Jam
  • Style: DN3707-160

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5