Nike air jordan 1 mid : For the collectors—this specific "air jordan 1 mid" collab might not have the hype of some Highs, but the quality on this pair is impressive [rsgdiu4e]

Stitching is on point, no glue stains I can see. It's a reminder that the Mid tier can still deliver a great product. Would I recommend it over a High? It depends. If the colorway speaks to you and you prefer the mid-cut silhouette, save the cash and go for it. Don't just chase the "OG" tag. Let's talk about the Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Alternate Bred'. Unboxing it, the black and red just pops—feels very classic Jordan. On-foot feel is firm and supportive, not much sink-in comfort. Visually, it's a staple. Compared to other Jordan models, like a Jordan 3, the comfort level is "not" the same—it's about the look. The clear advantage is its timeless, goes-with-everything aesthetic. The drawback? It's a basic, no-frills sneaker. For $120-$130 USD, it's a great beater or first Jordan. Not for comfort chasers. Now, the potential cons. If you need modern, bouncy cushioning for all-day wear, the "Air Jordan 1 Mid" is "not" that shoe. The break-in period is real - expect some stiffness. Also, the ankle padding on Mids can feel a bit thinner compared to some Highs. Now, a potential con – and this is just my personal take – some sneakerheads will always prefer the "OG" High silhouette. The "Air Jordan 1 Mid" can sometimes get overlooked in the broader Jordan conversation. Also, if you have wider feet, the break-in might be a bit more noticeable. It's not a wide-foot-friendly shoe straight out of the box, in my opinion.

• Shown: University Blue
• Style: AQ9129-500