Nike air jordan 1 mid : Now, a potential con? The materials [x80vxebb]

On some general release "Air Jordan 1 Mid" pairs, the leather can feel a bit stiff and plasticky. It's not the premium, tumbled stuff you get on top-tier retros. This is the main trade-off for the more accessible price point. So, if buttery-soft leather is your non-negotiable, you might be disappointed. But for most people, the look & legacy outweigh this. Honest review time! Unboxed this all-black "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid". The craftsmanship is clean—no glue stains or messy stitching. The initial feel is stiff, classic AJ1. After wearing them for a day, they loosened up nicely. I love how they look with jeans; that Mid height is "perfect". Compared to pricier Jordan series releases, this is an accessible entry. The "advantage" is durability and timelessness. The "potential issue"? Zero arch support. If you need that, grab an insert. For a wardrobe staple under "$130 USD", it's hard to beat. To wrap it up: The "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid" is a solid 7/10. It does its job well – it looks great and is built tough. Pros: iconic look, versatile, relatively affordable. Cons: basic comfort, not the OG design. It's a staple, not a revolution. Would I recommend it? For a stylish, durable beater sneaker – absolutely. On foot now, and my initial thought? They’re "stiff". Like, classic AJ1 stiff. The cushioning is firm – it's not a Boost or React kind of ride, for sure. But the ankle support & wrap? Honestly, "great". For casual wear & style, it's perfect. If you're looking for a plush, all-day walking shoe... this "might" not be your first pick. But for the look? Unbeatable.

• Shown: Royal Toe
• Style: AV2187-160