Also, if you're a purest for the "original" 1985 High-top design, the Mid's proportions might not do it for you. It's a slight variation on a theme, and some collectors only want the theme itself. Sliding into this "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid" "White Gym Red." The break-in is real, folks—the heel might rub a bit on day one. But once it settles, the fit is "secure" and classic. Visually, the Mid's proportions are slightly different from the High (shorter collar), and I think it looks great with cropped pants or shorts. The pro? You get that iconic Jordan 1 style at a more accessible $120 USD price point and (usually) easier availability. The con? Purists will always argue for the High. But for daily wear and style, this Mid is a winner in my book. Opening the box, this "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid" 'Bred' looks sharp. The leather has a nice grain, and the silhouette is, of course, legendary. On feet, they're snug (I went TTS) and feel planted. For YouTube shots? The Mid profile is super flattering on camera. A key "pro" is the vast array of colorways available in the Mid cut versus some harder-to-find Highs. On the flip side, the ankle padding is minimal. So, who are these for? Style-focused folks. Not for comfort-tech seekers. At ~"$120 USD", it's a style investment. Conversely, who might want to skip it? Serious performance athletes, or anyone needing maximum cushion for long periods on concrete. Also, if you have very wide feet, the break-in might be tougher. And if you're a die-hard "Highs only" collector, the "Mid" silhouette might not satisfy that specific itch. It serves a different purpose.
