This colorway, in particular, goes with literally everything in my wardrobe. It's a statement piece that doesn't try too hard. Cons? Well, the creasing is inevitable - you have to embrace it! For $180, you're paying for the legacy&iconic status, which, to me, is worth it. Unboxing this 'Court Purple' "Nike Air Jordan 1"—the color is even richer in person. The build is consistent, stitching looks good. Sliding my foot in, the padding around the ankle is noticeable (in a good way). Compared to a Jordan 4, it's definitely less bulky on foot. Major pro is its versatility for both jeans and shorts. The potential downside? They crease. A lot. It's part of the charm, but if you're super obsessive about keeping kicks pristine, that might bug you. Still, a classic worth having. Got this "Nike Air Jordan 1" in the 'Stage Haze' colorway. It's a messy, artsy look that I actually dig! For ~$180 USD, it's a statement piece. Fit is TTS, with that typical snug forefoot. What I like? It's different from your standard red/black/white "Jordan 1". What might turn people off? The distressed look isn't for everyone. Perfect for someone wanting to stand out in the "Jordan series". I've got the Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Banned' here. The black/red colorway is always a winner, and the price point is more accessible at ~$120. First impression? The materials feel a step down from the OG Highs - more synthetic. Comfort is similar to other Mids: good for all-day wear without being exceptional. "Upside": You get that iconic "Bred" look for less cash. "Downside": Sneaker enthusiasts often critique the Mid's quality and altered proportions. This is the ideal starter Jordan 1 for a younger audience or someone testing the waters without a huge investment. Seasoned collectors will likely pass for an OG High version.

  • Shown: Bred
  • Style: 528895-106

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5