Nike air jordan 1 : Just unboxed the Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Light Smoke Grey' [85dcsm0l]

At $135 USD, it's a more accessible price point. The materials feel a bit less premium than the High OGs, which is the main trade-off. On feet, the fit is similar - snug through the midfoot. The lower cut makes them feel a bit less bulky, honestly. For casual, everyday fits, they work perfectly. The advantage is the price and colorway simplicity. The disadvantage is sneakerheads might scoff at the Mid silhouette. I'd say these are ideal for someone wanting the AJ1 look on a budget, not for OG purists. First on-feet with this Air Jordan 1 High '85 cut – wow, the shape is "so much better". The toe box is sleeker, the collar is higher. It just looks… correct. The trade-off? They feel even stiffer out of the box than modern retros. Breaking these in will be a journey. Priced as a premium release (often $200+ USD), it's for the detail-obsessed fan who values silhouette accuracy above immediate comfort. If you're new to Jordans, a standard Retro High might be a more forgiving – and cheaper – first experience. Initial on-foot thoughts: the "Nike Air Jordan 1" sits you a bit higher off the ground than I remembered. It gives a confident stance. The toe box has decent room, which is great for wider feet. This "Bred Patent" version was about $200 USD. It's a loud, shiny statement. I love it for a night out. However, that patent leather doesn't breathe well at all—your feet will get warm. So, not my pick for summer all-dayers. Sliding these on... wow. Immediate thoughts? They're "stiff". Like, really stiff – it's that classic "Jordan 1" break-in period. The ankle support and lockdown are fantastic, though. They feel substantial on foot, not heavy, but you know you're wearing them. Compared to a modern Jordan like the 5 or 13, the cushioning is... basic. It's all about that court feel, for better or worse.

• Shown: Blank Canvas
• Style: DN3707-160