.. the suede and leather combo is "fire". On-foot impression is solid—good heel cushion, but the forefoot is flat. Compared to a Jordan 4, it's definitely less cushioned. "What's great": The rich colors and materials make it look more expensive than its $170 USD price tag. "What's not": Suede can be a hassle in bad weather. This is a shoe for someone who appreciates materials and a clean color-block. Not for someone who needs a "set it and forget it" kind of sneaker. Finally, looking at the Nike Air Jordan 1 High OG 'Dark Mocha'. This brown and black combo is pure luxury in sneaker form. The tumbled leather feels amazing. Putting them on, they scream premium from the materials to the fit. Compared to other Jordan series models like the 5 or 11, the 1 is less about tech and more about timeless style. "Strength": Unbeatable materials and a super rich color palette. "Weakness": The price has soared on the resale market, well above the $170 retail. My advice? If you can get these for close to retail, they're an incredible addition for any serious Jordan series fan. For those on a tight budget, the hunt might not be worth the stress. What's up, everyone? Got these Air Jordan 1 Mid SEs in today. First impression? The materials feel good for the price point – we're talking around $135 USD. I love the subtle twist on a classic. They're definitely lighter than the Highs, and the break-in time feels shorter. Great option if you want that Jordan 1 look without the high-top commitment or the higher price tag. So, on foot... honestly? The Air Jordan 1 isn't a comfort king. It's a bit stiff out of the box—you gotta break it in. The ankle collar offers good support, but don't expect boost-like cushioning. It's about that classic feel and look. For true sneakerheads who value style over supreme comfort, this is it.

  • Shown: Midnight Navy
  • Style: CT8527-115

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5