They break in and mold to your foot. But here's my real opinion: this shoe is more about the "look" than the "feel". When you have them on, they complete an outfit like few other sneakers can. That high-top silhouette just works. Compared to a Jordan 3 or 4, it's slimmer and less bulky. Is it worth the hype and the $180? For a fashion piece and a cultural icon, yes. For a performance or all-day walking shoe, no. It's a legend, but it's not trying to be something it's not. Know what you're buying into. Final verdict from me? For the price, it's a staple. It’s not the comfiest shoe I own, but it’s one of the most worn. The 'Court Purple' colorway here is just so easy to style. You're investing in a look that never goes out of style. If you find it on sale? Even better. A solid cop for your rotation. Here's my real take on the "Air Jordan 1 High OG" as a "daily" shoe. I've worn this 'Bred Patent' pair (about $200 USD) for a week. The pros? Durability and timeless style. The cons? They're heavy, and the ankle can rub. Compared to newer "Jordan" models with more tech? They feel dated. But that's not the point. You buy this for the look, not performance. Worth it for collectors, not for comfort-seekers. Unboxing the Nike Air Jordan 1 Low 'Starfish'. Wow, the orange is so bright and cheerful! As a Low model, it's much more of a summer / spring vibe. The feel on foot is "liberating" - no ankle collar to worry about, super easy to slip on and off. They're also lighter than the Highs, obviously. "Big plus": They're incredibly versatile for warmer weather outfits. "Drawback": You lose that iconic high-top look and ankle lockdown. At $140, I think these are perfect for someone who loves the Jordan 1 design but wants a more casual, low-profile option. Hardcore fans who only rock Highs might not be impressed.

  • Shown: Space Jam
  • Style: DQ4909-100

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5