Nike air jordan 1 : Let's be real- the cushioning is "basic" [cem9illi]

It's not 2025 tech. But that's not the point of an "Air Jordan 1". The point is the legacy, the clean lines, the way it completes a fit. This specific colorway is less common than some, which I love. At $180 USD, it sits in the "standard" range for Retros. I'd recommend it for a rotation, not as your only/everyday shoe. It's a style champion, not a comfort king. Finally, the Air Jordan 1 'Stage Haze' - a mostly leather build with some nice distressing. At $200, the details are cool. Initial fit? Standard. The cushioning hasn't changed. Where these shine is in casual wear; they look better with some wear and tear. Versus a pristine 'Black Toe,' these have more character. The advantage is the unique, pre-lived-in aesthetic. The disadvantage is the premium price for a purposely "aged" look. My take? They're perfect for someone who loves the worn-in sneaker trend, but not for collectors wanting a flawless, classic colorway to keep on ice. The major "pro" here is the timeless style. Seriously, the "Air Jordan 1" is a legend. This 'Laser Blue' version adds a nice, modern twist without losing that classic soul. The construction feels durable, & I expect them to hold up well. However, the "con" is the break-in period. The heel & ankle collar can be stiff initially – "ouch" – so you gotta wear them in. Not the most comfortable shoe straight out of the box, that's for sure. What's up, everyone? Just unboxed the Air Jordan 1 High OG 'Stage Haze'. My first thought? That sail and grey suede combo looks even better in hand—"super" versatile. On foot, it's the iconic AJ1 experience: a bit stiff initially, but great ankle lock. At $180, you're paying for that OG shape and quality materials. Compared to newer Js, it's less about tech and more about silhouette. Love it for collectors and style-first folks. Not for runners or comfort chasers, period.

• Shown: Bred
• Style: DJ5718-300