Initial impression? The fit is true to size for me, offering that familiar, "snug" wrap-around the midfoot, thanks to the high-top design. It's a "secure" feeling, though it can be a bit "stiff" at first. Don't expect crazy cushioning – this is an '85 tech shoe, after all. But, for everyday casual wear? It's perfectly "fine". The "Air Jordan 1" just has that classic, "grounded" feel that many sneakerheads love. Just copped the Nike Air Jordan 1 High OG 'University Blue'. Man, this color is stunning in natural light - camera loves it. The leather is decent, typical of recent OG releases. On-feet impression? They're narrow. If you have wider feet, you might need to size up half or be prepared for a tight break-in. "Positive": The silhouette is arguably the most recognizable in sneaker history. "Negative": The outsole is quite flat with minimal traction pattern, not great for wet surfaces. Priced at $170, I'd say these are for collectors of the Jordan series and fans of this specific colorway. For performance or wide-footers, be cautious. Final verdict from me? For the price, it's a staple. It’s not the comfiest shoe I own, but it’s one of the most worn. The 'Court Purple' colorway here is just so easy to style. You're investing in a look that never goes out of style. If you find it on sale? Even better. A solid cop for your rotation. Let's compare: Air Jordan 1 High vs. an Air Force 1. The AJ1, for me, has a sharper, more athletic profile on foot. It's also noticeably lighter. The comfort is a draw – both have that firm, supportive base. The Jordan 1's ankle collar offers more lockdown for me, though. At a similar price point (~$170 USD vs. $110 for AF1), you're paying for that basketball heritage and iconic status. Perfect if you prefer a higher, more structured look. If you like a chunkier, more relaxed fit, the AF1 might still be your go-to.
