Nike air jordan 1 : Yo, checking out this "Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid" in a cool new color [dkqwmrus]

Honestly? For a $125 USD price point, the materials are... acceptable. Not as buttery as the Highs, but the shape is still there. On foot, they feel "lighter" and break in faster. It's a great entry point into the Jordan series. Pro: affordable and tons of color options. Con: purists will always prefer the High OG silhouette. If you're on a budget or just experimenting with style, the Mid is a solid pick. Don't let the hype fool you. The major pro of this Nike Air Jordan 1? Its endless versatility. This colorway, in particular, goes with literally everything in my wardrobe. It's a statement piece that doesn't try too hard. Cons? Well, the creasing is inevitable - you have to embrace it! For $180, you're paying for the legacy&iconic status, which, to me, is worth it. Here's my real take on the "Air Jordan 1 High OG" as a "daily" shoe. I've worn this 'Bred Patent' pair (about $200 USD) for a week. The pros? Durability and timeless style. The cons? They're heavy, and the ankle can rub. Compared to newer "Jordan" models with more tech? They feel dated. But that's not the point. You buy this for the look, not performance. Worth it for collectors, not for comfort-seekers. Just copped the Nike Air Jordan 1 High OG 'University Blue'. Man, this color is stunning in natural light - camera loves it. The leather is decent, typical of recent OG releases. On-feet impression? They're narrow. If you have wider feet, you might need to size up half or be prepared for a tight break-in. "Positive": The silhouette is arguably the most recognizable in sneaker history. "Negative": The outsole is quite flat with minimal traction pattern, not great for wet surfaces. Priced at $170, I'd say these are for collectors of the Jordan series and fans of this specific colorway. For performance or wide-footers, be cautious.

• Shown: Denim
• Style: AV2187-160