The patent leather finish is polarizing - super shiny in person. It's a $200 statement piece. Putting them on, they're actually a bit less flexible than standard leather pairs. The feel is more rigid, and they crease differently. On camera, that shine really catches the light. The big pro is the unique look and durability of the patent. The big con? They might feel too flashy or stiff for some. I think these are for collectors who want something different in their rotation, not for someone seeking a subtle, beaten-up look. Check out this pair: the Nike Air Jordan 1 High OG 'Electro Orange'. The colors are crazy vibrant in hand - they really pop! Construction feels solid, classic Jordan 1 build. Sliding my foot in, the break-in period is real; they start off stiff but mold to your foot over time. Compared to a Jordan 3 or 4, there's definitely less cushioning - you feel the court. "Advantage"? Unbeatable ankle support and that iconic profile. "Disadvantage"? Not the best for long hours of walking. At $170, I'd recommend these to someone who values style & support over all-day comfort, or for casual, short-term wear. Gym? No. Looking fresh? Yes. On feet now. Honestly, the comfort is... fine? It's not a modern sneaker. There's decent ankle support, but the footbed is flat. For $180, you're paying for the icon status. Walking around, you feel that history. It's a stylish shoe, not a performance one. That's the main takeaway here for me today. Here's my real take on the "Air Jordan 1 High OG" as a "daily" shoe. I've worn this 'Bred Patent' pair (about $200 USD) for a week. The pros? Durability and timeless style. The cons? They're heavy, and the ankle can rub. Compared to newer "Jordan" models with more tech? They feel dated. But that's not the point. You buy this for the look, not performance. Worth it for collectors, not for comfort-seekers.
