The white leather really brightens up the fit. A huge pro is how easy these are to style. A con? Keeping them clean, obviously. At $170+ for most retros, you'll wanna baby them. Compared to a dunk, the Jordan 1 just has more… presence. More attitude. You feel it when you wear 'em. What's up, everyone? Just got this "Nike Air Jordan 1" in the 'Shadow' grey colorway. Opening the box, the materials feel premium—no complaints there. When I put them on, the fit was TTS (true to size), giving a secure, classic basketball shoe feel. Visually, they're less flashy than other Jordans, which I love for daily wear. At around $170 USD, it's a staple. Perfect for a low-key flex. Not perfect for long walks, though—my feet were talking to me after a few hours! Straight out of the box, the 'University Blue' on this Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG is just "clean". The leather feels pretty decent for a GR release. Sliding them on, they feel true to size with a snug – almost classic – fit. Honestly, the comfort level is what you'd expect: firm, not plush. This iconic silhouette, though? It's a forever-flex for any wardrobe. At $170 USD, it's a staple. I'd recommend it to anyone building a core Jordan collection, but maybe not for folks who prioritize all-day cloud-like comfort. Just got my hands on this "nike air jordan 1" Low 'Neutral Olive'. The unboxing was smooth – the colors are more muted and wearable than I expected. Slipping these on is actually more comfortable than the highs; the low cut is less restrictive. For a Jordan 1 low, the price is usually fair, around $110-$130 USD. It’s a great summer/spring shoe. Pros: Easy to wear, less break-in time. Cons: Lacks the dramatic presence of the high-top. This is perfect for someone who wants a touch of the Jordan series in a low-profile package.

  • Shown: Smoke Grey
  • Style: 555088-701

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5