It's not my go-to for comfort, but few shoes have this level of impact. The design is iconic for a reason. I'd say cop a colorway you truly love – don't just buy for hype. It's a cornerstone of any solid sneaker collection, period. I've got the Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Banned' here. The black/red colorway is always a winner, and the price point is more accessible at ~$120. First impression? The materials feel a step down from the OG Highs - more synthetic. Comfort is similar to other Mids: good for all-day wear without being exceptional. "Upside": You get that iconic "Bred" look for less cash. "Downside": Sneaker enthusiasts often critique the Mid's quality and altered proportions. This is the ideal starter Jordan 1 for a younger audience or someone testing the waters without a huge investment. Seasoned collectors will likely pass for an OG High version. Alright, let's get into these! Unboxing this pair of "Nike Air Jordan 1" in the 'Chicago' colorway—wow. The red and white just "pop" instantly. Honestly, the build quality on this pair feels solid right out of the box. Sliding them on? It's that iconic, slightly stiff feel—not the most plush, but the lockdown is great. For $180 USD, you're paying for the legacy. If you want a piece of Jordan series history and a versatile sneaker, it's a yes. Just don't expect cloud-like comfort. So I’m lacing up this "nike air jordan 1 mid" in the 'Light Smoke Grey'... and my "immediate" thought? These are super easy to wear. The break-in period is real—expect some heel rub initially. Compared to my Jordan 11s, the tech is "ancient", but the silhouette is timeless. "Big plus": the price point, around $115 USD, makes it an accessible entry into the Jordan series. Downside? The materials can feel a bit "basic". Great for beginners, not for comfort snobs.

  • Shown: Pollen
  • Style: CU1110-010

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5