This 'Shadow Grey' pair? I can dress it up a bit or keep it super casual. The color blocking is just genius. Another pro is durability – the materials, while sometimes basic, can take a beating. These are shoes you can actually wear regularly without babying them (aside from the creasing!). So I copped this Air Jordan 1 Mid with the altered "Satin" swoosh. The presentation is cool! In hand, the materials are a mix – some standard leather, some interesting accents. On foot, it performs like any other Mid: good for the price (~$120 USD). The unique design elements are what you're paying for here. It's a fun twist for someone who already has a few core AJ1s and wants something different. As a first or only Jordan 1? I'd probably point you towards a more classic color-blocking for maximum versatility. I've got the Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Banned' here. The black/red colorway is always a winner, and the price point is more accessible at ~$120. First impression? The materials feel a step down from the OG Highs - more synthetic. Comfort is similar to other Mids: good for all-day wear without being exceptional. "Upside": You get that iconic "Bred" look for less cash. "Downside": Sneaker enthusiasts often critique the Mid's quality and altered proportions. This is the ideal starter Jordan 1 for a younger audience or someone testing the waters without a huge investment. Seasoned collectors will likely pass for an OG High version. Okay, here are the 'Stage Haze' Air Jordan 1s. The mismatched leathers - smooth and cracked - are a really cool detail up close. On feet, they feel like any other Jordan 1: reliable, supportive, flat. For $180 USD, you're paying for the unique design. Compared to a plain white shoe, these have so much more character. Great if you want something classic but with a twist.

  • Shown: Patent Bred
  • Style: DV3742-021

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5