The build quality is solid for the price point, which is under $130 USD. On foot, the ankle collar is a bit stiffer than the Highs, but break-in helps. The silhouette? Timeless. It's a fantastic, more affordable entry into the "Jordan series". Great for daily wear. However, sneaker purists might always prefer the High-top OG shape, just saying. The leather on this 'University Blue' pair is really nice—smooth and it'll crease beautifully. Wearing them, they feel substantial, not heavy, but you know you've got them on. Compared to, say, a Jordan 4? Definitely lighter & more low-profile. The "Air Jordan 1" just works with "everything" — jeans, shorts, you name it. It's a style chameleon, honestly. Just unboxed the Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Light Smoke Grey'. At $135 USD, it's a more accessible price point. The materials feel a bit less premium than the High OGs, which is the main trade-off. On feet, the fit is similar - snug through the midfoot. The lower cut makes them feel a bit less bulky, honestly. For casual, everyday fits, they work perfectly. The advantage is the price and colorway simplicity. The disadvantage is sneakerheads might scoff at the Mid silhouette. I'd say these are ideal for someone wanting the AJ1 look on a budget, not for OG purists. Final verdict on this Air Jordan 1? It's legendary for a reason – the design is unbeatable. Pros: timeless style, easy to style, and durable construction. Cons: the out-of-box comfort isn't modern, and the high-top can feel restrictive. At around $170 USD for most High OGs, it's an investment in a style icon, not a tech marvel. I'd say it's a must-have for sneaker enthusiasts and style-minded folks. I would NOT recommend it as your primary shoe if you're on your feet all day and need ultimate cushioning – that's just being real with you

  • Shown: Navy Velvet
  • Style: 555088-063

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5