At $200, the details are cool. Initial fit? Standard. The cushioning hasn't changed. Where these shine is in casual wear; they look better with some wear and tear. Versus a pristine 'Black Toe,' these have more character. The advantage is the unique, pre-lived-in aesthetic. The disadvantage is the premium price for a purposely "aged" look. My take? They're perfect for someone who loves the worn-in sneaker trend, but not for collectors wanting a flawless, classic colorway to keep on ice. Unboxing the "Air Jordan 1 Low" 'Wolf Grey'. I'm always impressed by how clean Lows look. This pair is no exception — premium suede & leather combo for about $130. On foot, they're lighter & more freeing than Highs. Perfect for spring/summer fits. However, the outsole traction isn't great for serious sports. As a lifestyle shoe? Fantastic. It's a must for low-top fans, but performance hoopers should steer clear. The Jordan 1 Low is having a major moment for a reason. Hey, checking out the Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Fearless'. I know, I know—some people hate on Mids. But opening this box? The colorway on this one is actually fire. It's more accessible too, around $120 USD. On foot, the fit is slightly roomier than Highs for me. The pro is definitely the value—you get that Jordan 1 look for less. The con is the materials can feel a bit less premium than some High OG releases. I’d say these are great for younger fans or anyone on a budget starting their Jordan collection. Hardcore OG-only purists? They'll probably skip it, and that's okay! The craftsmanship on this "'Dark Mocha' Air Jordan 1" is impressive. Stitching is clean, the suede feels nice. On foot, the fit is true to size for me. It's a premium-feeling release in the "Jordan series". The downside? That premium feel comes with a $170+ price - it's an investment.

  • Shown: Neutral Grey
  • Style: 378037-061

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5