Honestly? I'm loving the low-top vibe for summer. They were about $110 USD, which feels fair. The break-in time is basically zero - they're comfy right away. Compared to the high-tops, you lose that locked-in feel, but you gain a ton of casual versatility. A great option if you find the classic "Nike Air Jordan 1" High a bit too bulky for your style. Who should avoid it? If you need cloud-like comfort, look elsewhere—maybe to the Jordan 13 or something with Zoom air. Also, if you have very wide feet, the "nike air jordan 1" can feel narrow, especially during break-in. It's not the most forgiving fit. My advice? Try a half-size up if you're unsure. This shoe is about aesthetics first, performance second. Know what you're signing up for. Here's the deal with the Air Jordan 1 'Mid' in 'Black Gym Red'. It's the more accessible sibling. The box is smaller, the price is lower (around $120), and you lose a bit of the height. First on-feet impression? Honestly, very similar to the High. The materials might feel a "touch" less premium, but the overall comfort profile is identical — firm. For someone new to the Jordan series and not wanting to drop $180+, this is a solid entry point. You still get that iconic look 90% of the way there. Just know purists might side-eye the Mid cut. But for practicality and value? It's a really good option. What's up, everyone? Just got this "Nike Air Jordan 1" in the 'Shadow' grey colorway. Opening the box, the materials feel premium—no complaints there. When I put them on, the fit was TTS (true to size), giving a secure, classic basketball shoe feel. Visually, they're less flashy than other Jordans, which I love for daily wear. At around $170 USD, it's a staple. Perfect for a low-key flex. Not perfect for long walks, though—my feet were talking to me after a few hours!

  • Shown: Royal
  • Style: 555088-062

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5