The suede and leather combo is "chef's kiss". This is a ~$170 USD shoe that feels premium. On foot, it's stiff initially but molds over time. The colorway is super wearable. My main gripe? Creasing is very noticeable on the soft toe box leather. If you're neurotic about keeping your "Jordan 1"s pristine, this might stress you out. But for beaters? They age beautifully. So I copped this Air Jordan 1 Mid with the altered "Satin" swoosh. The presentation is cool! In hand, the materials are a mix – some standard leather, some interesting accents. On foot, it performs like any other Mid: good for the price (~$120 USD). The unique design elements are what you're paying for here. It's a fun twist for someone who already has a few core AJ1s and wants something different. As a first or only Jordan 1? I'd probably point you towards a more classic color-blocking for maximum versatility. So, I just got the 'University Blue' Air Jordan 1s in. My first impression? That blue pops "way" more in person than in pictures. The leather is standard, not premium, but it's clean. Slip them on... and yeah, you feel that classic AJ1 support. It's not a plush shoe, though. If you want cloud-like comfort, look elsewhere. For style points? 10/10. Just unboxed the Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Light Smoke Grey'. At $135 USD, it's a more accessible price point. The materials feel a bit less premium than the High OGs, which is the main trade-off. On feet, the fit is similar - snug through the midfoot. The lower cut makes them feel a bit less bulky, honestly. For casual, everyday fits, they work perfectly. The advantage is the price and colorway simplicity. The disadvantage is sneakerheads might scoff at the Mid silhouette. I'd say these are ideal for someone wanting the AJ1 look on a budget, not for OG purists.

  • Shown: Blank Canvas
  • Style: 555088-041

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5