Nike air jordan 1 : First impressions of this AJ1 Mid? For $135, the value is there [oml7qgvw]

The colors are vibrant, and the build has no obvious flaws. Once on, the ankle collar is lower than the Highs—personal preference thing. They feel lighter, too. The insole is pretty basic, so an upgrade there helps a ton. Honestly, this is a great entry into the Jordan series. It's a comfortable, everyday version of the icon. Not for purists who need the OG High cut, but fantastic for most. Sliding these on... the fit is true to size, offering that snug, secure wrap the AJ1 is known for. Honestly, the cushioning? It's firm. Don't expect Boost-level cloud comfort. It's a retro basketball shoe, so you feel connected to the ground—great for style, not for all-day walks. That's the real talk on the "air jordan 1" experience. Inspecting the details on this "Air Jordan 1" 'Dark Mocha'... the suede and leather combo is "fire". On-foot impression is solid—good heel cushion, but the forefoot is flat. Compared to a Jordan 4, it's definitely less cushioned. "What's great": The rich colors and materials make it look more expensive than its $170 USD price tag. "What's not": Suede can be a hassle in bad weather. This is a shoe for someone who appreciates materials and a clean color-block. Not for someone who needs a "set it and forget it" kind of sneaker. Just copped the Nike Air Jordan 1 High OG 'University Blue'. Man, this color is stunning in natural light - camera loves it. The leather is decent, typical of recent OG releases. On-feet impression? They're narrow. If you have wider feet, you might need to size up half or be prepared for a tight break-in. "Positive": The silhouette is arguably the most recognizable in sneaker history. "Negative": The outsole is quite flat with minimal traction pattern, not great for wet surfaces. Priced at $170, I'd say these are for collectors of the Jordan series and fans of this specific colorway. For performance or wide-footers, be cautious.

• Shown: Dark Iris
• Style: DZ5485-303