.. wow. Immediate thoughts? They're "stiff". Like, really stiff – it's that classic "Jordan 1" break-in period. The ankle support and lockdown are fantastic, though. They feel substantial on foot, not heavy, but you know you're wearing them. Compared to a modern Jordan like the 5 or 13, the cushioning is... basic. It's all about that court feel, for better or worse. Let's talk about the elephant in the room: comfort. The OG "Nike Air Jordan 1" isn't a modern performance shoe. After a few hours, my feet did feel it. The advantage, though? That ankle support is legit, and the flat base is great for casual wear. At ~$180, you're buying the look & the legacy. It’s a fair trade-off if you value design over max comfort. Okay, on feet in the "Air Jordan 1 High OG 'Royal Blue'". Instant classic vibe. The leather quality on this specific release is "really" good—tumbled and soft. How do they feel? Sturdy. Supportive. But that Phylon midsole? Yeah, it's a brick compared to today's standards. "The upside" is the unmatched silhouette and style pedigree. At ~$180 USD, it's an investment in a look. I'd recommend it to collectors and style-focused wearers. Skip it if your priority is plush, all-day comfort. First on-feet with this Air Jordan 1 High '85 cut – wow, the shape is "so much better". The toe box is sleeker, the collar is higher. It just looks… correct. The trade-off? They feel even stiffer out of the box than modern retros. Breaking these in will be a journey. Priced as a premium release (often $200+ USD), it's for the detail-obsessed fan who values silhouette accuracy above immediate comfort. If you're new to Jordans, a standard Retro High might be a more forgiving – and cheaper – first experience.
