For $180, this is a solid entry from the Jordan series. The shape is perfect, a true classic. Holding it, you just "know" it's iconic. My first impression is super positive, honestly? Alright, so the "Nike Air Jordan 1" 'Taxi' just arrived, and honestly - the yellow accents are "way" crisper in person than in photos! The build quality feels solid right out of the box. For around $180 USD, this colorway is an instant classic in the "Jordan series". Sliding them on, they feel exactly like you'd expect: a bit stiff at first, but the ankle support is top-tier. Honestly, if you love that iconic high-top look, this is a must. So, here's the Air Jordan 1 Low 'Black Toe'. I've been waiting for this colorway in a low! The quality here is solid for a low-top—nice, tumbled leather. At about $110 USD, it’s a more affordable way into the Jordan 1 universe. On foot, it's light and easy to slip on & off. The pro is the summer-ready, casual versatility. The con? You lose the iconic high-top support and look. This is perfect for people who find high-tops too bulky or hot. If you live for that classic high-top Jordan 1 silhouette, then the low version just won't hit the same, you know? Yo, what's up, everyone? Just unboxed these Nike Air Jordan 1 'Chicago' Reimagined. First thing I notice? That leather quality is absolutely "superior" compared to some older releases - it's soft, buttery. The classic color-blocking is just "iconic", no question. Putting them on, the fit is true-to-size with a secure, snug wrap around the ankle. Honestly, for $200, you're paying for the legacy and that timeless look. The "downside"? The Air Jordan 1 isn't known for plush cushioning - it's a firm, flat court feel. If you're all about comfort-tech, look elsewhere. But for style-hounds & collectors? This is a must-have, period.

  • Shown: Pollen
  • Style: 555088-501

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5