It's not the comfiest, nor the most innovative shoe in 2024. But its design impact is forever. If you appreciate sneaker culture and want an iconic look, grab a pair you love. Just know what you're getting into: incredible style, with a very classic (read: firm) feel. Hope this honest review helps you decide! Alright, let's get into these "new" Air Jordan 1 Mids, the 'Bred Toe' colorway. First off, the color-blocking is "so" clean—a classic Chicago mix with that black toe box. For $135 USD, the leather feels decent right out of the box. Sliding my foot in, the fit is true to size with a snug, "classic" AJ1 feel—it's not plush, but it's supportive. Honestly? This is a perfect starter Jordan or a great daily beater. If you need max comfort, look elsewhere, but for style and history, it's a solid pick. I've got the Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Banned' here. The black/red colorway is always a winner, and the price point is more accessible at ~$120. First impression? The materials feel a step down from the OG Highs - more synthetic. Comfort is similar to other Mids: good for all-day wear without being exceptional. "Upside": You get that iconic "Bred" look for less cash. "Downside": Sneaker enthusiasts often critique the Mid's quality and altered proportions. This is the ideal starter Jordan 1 for a younger audience or someone testing the waters without a huge investment. Seasoned collectors will likely pass for an OG High version. On camera, these 'Royal Blue' Jordan 1s just pop. That contrast between the black, blue, and white is timeless. They're heavier than I expected – you feel that solid construction. Compared to a Dunk, the AJ1 has more presence, more history in its silhouette. A definite head-turner for any sneaker rotation, but maybe not your go-to for a long walk.

  • Shown: Gold Hoops
  • Style: 555088-041

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5