The pros: unmatched style, incredible colorway history, and a build that lasts. The cons: basic comfort and a premium price for retro tech. Would I recommend them? Yes – but only if you value design over cutting-edge feel. They're a must-have for a reason, but they're not for everyone's feet. Comparing it to other Jordans... The "Air Jordan 1" is the foundation. The AJ4 has more cushion, the AJ11 has that patent leather shine. But the 1? It's the pure, original blueprint. The pros are timeless design and unmatched cultural status. The con? It can feel a bit "basic" now because "everyone" has a pair. But sometimes, classic is just classic. Comparing this to other Jordans... it's the foundation, right? The "Jordan 1" started it all. Next to a "Jordan 4" – the 4 has more cushion and tech. Next to a "Jordan 11" – the 11 feels more premium. But the 1? It's pure style. It's the blueprint. For $180, you're buying history and a look that never dies. It's a different kind of value. Just copped the Nike Air Jordan 1 High OG 'University Blue'. Man, this color is stunning in natural light - camera loves it. The leather is decent, typical of recent OG releases. On-feet impression? They're narrow. If you have wider feet, you might need to size up half or be prepared for a tight break-in. "Positive": The silhouette is arguably the most recognizable in sneaker history. "Negative": The outsole is quite flat with minimal traction pattern, not great for wet surfaces. Priced at $170, I'd say these are for collectors of the Jordan series and fans of this specific colorway. For performance or wide-footers, be cautious.
