The pros: unmatched style, incredible colorway history, and a build that lasts. The cons: basic comfort and a premium price for retro tech. Would I recommend them? Yes – but only if you value design over cutting-edge feel. They're a must-have for a reason, but they're not for everyone's feet. Let's talk about the Air Jordan 1 Low OG 'Neutral Grey'. A Low at $110 USD - great value. Opening the box, the craftsmanship is clean. On feet, they're instantly more comfortable than the Highs - less restriction around the ankle. The silhouette is sleek for summer. The pro is the easy, relaxed vibe and better comfort out of the gate. The con is some feel Lows lack the iconic presence of the Highs. Honestly, I'd recommend these to anyone wanting Jordan 1 style with a break from the high-top. Not for those who live for that classic, high-top basketball silhouette. Now, the potential con: break-in time. That stiff leather can rub at the heel or pinky toe initially. It "does" get better, but the first few wears might be a bit... uncomfortable? Also, the flat traction is just okay on super slick surfaces. It's a casual/ lifestyle shoe first, remember that. Pulling these "nike air jordan 1" 'Bred Patent' out the box… the shine is "crazy" in the light. They feel more rigid than the standard leather versions. On foot, that means less natural flex, maybe a tighter break-in. The "benefit" is the insane visual impact and easy-to-clean surface. The "drawback" is the potential for creasing to look more severe. For a bold, statement sneaker in the Jordan series, it's a win. For a subtle, everyday beater? Probably not your pick.
