It's more structured and bulky. Versus a Jordan 3, the toe box is roomier. I'd say the 4 offers a unique blend of cushioning and that high-top support. It's not as sleek as a 1, but it has its own bold, architectural vibe that makes it stand out in the "Jordan series". To wrap it up—this is a strong release. The pros (iconic look, true-to-form retro) far outweigh the cons (basic comfort) for me. It's a sneaker you buy with your eyes, not necessarily your feet. Would I recommend it? Yes, if you understand what you're getting: a classic, stylish shoe that's more about vibe than tech. Solid cop. On feet, the design really pops. The 'Military Blue' accents against the white and grey work so well. The mesh panels and those plastic wing eyelets? They give the "Jordan 4" such a unique, technical look. It's a shoe that gets compliments. In person, the materials have a nice presence. It's not the most premium AJ4 ever, but it looks great on camera and in real life. Alright, so I just got the "Nike Air Jordan 4 Retro" in the 'Military Blue' colorway. First impression? The shape is on point – really solid construction this time. The nubuck feels decent, and that classic silhouette? It's just iconic, man. Unboxing these is always a vibe. They look even better in hand than in the pics, for real.
