It's bulkier, more of a statement. Versus a Jordan 3, the toe box is roomier. I'd say the 4 offers a unique blend of high-top support and that chunky, late-80s basketball aesthetic. It's its own thing within the "Jordan series". Now, the cons or things to consider. The toe box can feel a bit stiff and narrow for some people. Break-in time is real. Also, that exposed Air unit in the heel? You gotta be careful – it can pop if you're really rough. And the traction on dusty surfaces isn't the greatest. It's not a performance shoe anymore, so keep that in mind if you're thinking about balling in them. So, is the "Nike Air Jordan 4 Retro" worth the $210? For me, yes—if you love the design. You're paying for the iconic status and timeless style. Just go in with the right expectations: great looks, decent materials, but average comfort by today's standards. It's a solid pickup for the rotation. Comparing it to other Jordans? The "Air Jordan 4 Retro" sits higher and feels a bit bulkier than, say, an AJ1 or AJ3. The toebox is roomier. Cushioning-wise, I'd say it's less forgiving than an AJ11 but more substantial than an AJ1. It's its own thing. If you like that late-80s, chunky basketball aesthetic, this is it. The silhouette is unmistakable.
