Nike air jordan 4 retro : Now, potential cons [v1k0ch4u]

The toe box can feel a bit stiff and boxy for some foot shapes. Break-in time is real. Also, that firm midsole cushioning might disappoint if you're used to super soft, modern sneakers. It's not a "comfort-first" model. And at ~$210, you're paying for the legacy and design, not cutting-edge tech. Let's talk on-feet. I laced up these "Jordan 4 Retros", and the fit is true to size for me. The comfort is... it's a retro, so you know what to expect. It's not ultra-plush like some modern shoes, but the Air unit in the heel does its job for casual wear. The lockdown is good, though the plastic wings can feel a bit stiff initially. They're not heavy, but you definitely feel their presence. Who should maybe skip it? If you prioritize ultimate, cutting-edge comfort above all else, look elsewhere. This isn't a performance shoe. Also, if you dislike a bulkier silhouette, the "Air Jordan 4" might not be your vibe. It's a specific look that not everyone loves, and that's okay! Comparing it to other Jordans? The "Jordan 4 Retro" sits between the 3 and the 5 for me. It's more structured than a 3, but often more wearable than a bulkier 5. The toe box on the 4 is roomier than some newer models, which is a plus for wider feet. It's a classic for a reason in the "Jordan series".

• Shown: Royal
• Style: CZ6509-100