Also, if you're all about that bold, high-top "Jordan" look, the "6 Low" might feel too subdued. It serves a specific, lifestyle purpose. Alright, so I just got the Nike Air Jordan 6 Low in the 'White Infrared' colorway. First impression out of the box? Clean. The build quality feels solid, and that low-cut silhouette is instantly noticeable. It's a classic look, but in a more casual, wearable form. The price point is around $200 USD, which is pretty standard for a Jordan retro these days. Comparing it to other Jordans? The Air Jordan 6 Low is definitely more streamlined than the AJ1 Low. It has more of that 90s basketball shoe DNA. Versus the high-top AJ6, you lose some ankle coverage, obviously, but you gain in everyday wearability. The tongue is still padded, which is a nice carry-over. It's a different vibe – less statement, more subtle flex, if that makes sense. Who should skip it? If you're after top-tier, premium materials, you might be disappointed. Also, hardcore performance basketball players – obviously, look elsewhere. And if you only like the "original" high-top silhouette, the low version might feel like it's missing something.