It's less statement-making but super wearable. Versus the high-top "Jordan 6", you lose some ankle presence but gain a lot in everyday comfort and style flexibility. It's a different vibe for sure. Now, potential downsides? If you're used to modern, bouncy cushioning, the "Jordan 6 Low" might feel a bit dated and firm underfoot. Also, that snug fit could be tight for wider feet—maybe go half a size up. It's not for everyone, especially hardcore ballers. Now, a potential con: the tech is dated. If you're used to React or Zoom Air cushioning for all-day comfort, these might feel a bit stiff. They're not performance basketball shoes anymore. Also, the nubuck can be tricky to clean. Just something to keep in mind for the $200 price tag. Comparing it to other Lows in the "Jordan series", like the AJ1 Low or AJ5 Low, the "Jordan 6 Low" has its own unique charm. It's less ubiquitous than the 1s, which I kinda like. The toe box shape is distinctive. For around $200 USD, you're getting a piece of iconic design history in a more wearable, low-profile package. That's a win in my book.
