Nike air jordan 6 : Comparing it to other Jordans [h3aj6ag8]

.. the Air Jordan 6 sits differently than a Jordan 3 or 4. It's less bulky than a Jordan 5 but has more structure than a Jordan 1. The cushioning setup is similar to other retros of its era—functional but not modern. If you love the 90s aesthetic, this is a cornerstone model in the Jordan series. Alright, so I just got the "Nike Air Jordan 6 'Infrared'" in hand. First off, the box is classic Jordan Brand. The shoe itself? The silhouette is iconic, man. The build quality feels solid right out of the box—no glue stains or anything funky on my pair. That nubuck material on the upper has a nice, premium feel to it. For $200 USD, the initial impression is pretty strong, honestly. Now, potential cons. The toe box can feel a bit rigid initially; it needs a break-in period. And like I said, it's not a lightweight shoe. If you prefer minimal, flexible trainers, this isn't it. Also, at $200 USD, it's an investment. Some might find the style too chunky compared to modern, streamlined sneakers. It's a specific look. Who should maybe skip it? If you're solely chasing the most advanced, pillowy-soft comfort tech, look at newer models. Also, if you prefer super lightweight shoes, the "Jordan 6" has some heft to it—it's not heavy, but you feel its presence. Performance ballers might want more modern tools, too.

• Shown: Obsidian
• Style: CD0461-100