The heel lockdown is secure, and the toe box has a good amount of room. Aesthetically? They’re a camera magnet—every detail, from the embossed logos to the dual laces, gets noticed. For ~$190, you’re getting a piece of sneaker culture. Just be real with yourself: are you buying it for love, or just the hype? They’re not the most comfortable "Jordan 1" ever, but they’re arguably the coolest. Comparing it side-by-side with my standard 'Bred' Jordan 1, the Travis Scott version has a slightly bulkier feel around the collar. The iconic silhouette is there, but those extra details (the reverse Swoosh, the branding on the heel) make it stand out in a crowd. Comfort-wise? It's a draw — both are stiff at first. The major pro is its unique identity within the Jordan series. The con is its insane aftermarket price (often $1,800+ USD). It's a trophy piece, plain and simple. Yo, first time holding the Travis Scott Air Jordan 1 in hand – the hidden stash pocket inside the collar? Genius little detail 🤯. The sail/mocha color scheme looks even better in natural light. Wearing them, they feel sturdy and supportive. Compared to my other Jordan 1s, the suede nap is way more pronounced. A huge plus is the unique storytelling. A minus? They get dirty so easily, and that high price tag is a barrier. Perfect for sneakerheads who appreciate collaboration stories, not so much for folks on a tight budget. Comparing it to other Jordan 1 collaborations, this one feels more "conceptual". It's not just a new color — it's a reimagining of the entire side panel with that reverse Swoosh. That's the genius of the "Travis Scott Air Jordan 1". The quality of materials (especially on earlier releases) is generally a step above your average GR Jordan. It justifies part of the hype, at least from a craftsmanship perspective.

  • Shown: Neutral Grey
  • Style: CT8527-700

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5