It's not just plain leather; you get some nice texture details. On foot, the weight is good—not too heavy. Compared to some recent Jordan 1 releases, the quality here feels consistent. A clear advantage is the color blocking; it just works with so many fits. A possible downside? Sizing can be snug, so consider going up half a size if you have wider feet. Unboxing these, I was curious about the comfort. The wmns Air Jordan 1 Mid has the same basic tooling as the High — meaning, yeah, it's firm. You feel the court heritage. But for walking around town? It's fine after a short break-in. The padded collar helps. My favorite part is how they style — they just "elevate" a simple jeans-and-tee look instantly. Pro: Style multiplier. Con: Not a all-day, walking-city comfort shoe. Ideal for casual wear, not for long-distance. Let's talk about these "wmns air jordan 1 mid" sneakers on feet. I went with my usual size, and the fit is good - secure in the heel, decent room in the toe box. The insole is pretty standard, so comfort is... acceptable, not amazing. Where this shoe shines, for real, is in its looks. That Mid profile works so well with cropped pants or jeans. It's more accessible price-wise (around "$125 USD") than many other "Jordan series" releases. Just know it's more of a fashion piece than a performance shoe nowadays. Unboxing this pair was a vibe! The quality here is surprisingly good – nice leather, clean stitches. Slipping the wmns air jordan 1 mid on, the fit is true to size (TTS for me). It's not a "comfort" sneaker per se, but the ankle support is great. Compared to some recent Jordans, this mid-top feels perfect... not too high, not too low. Love it for the look, but if you hate breaking shoes in? Be ready for that. Perfect for casual fits, not for your gym session.

  • Shown: Heritage
  • Style: 555088-035

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5