Also, if you have "very" wide feet, the standard fit might be too narrow. This shoe prioritizes a specific look and feel (that firm OG ride) over universal comfort. It's not trying to be everything for everyone. Comparing this to other Jordans? The "wmns Air Jordan 1" is the foundation, man. "Versus" a Jordan 3 or 4? It's "way" less cushioned. "Versus" a Jordan 1 Low? The high-top offers more ankle… "presence", I guess? For the $180 price tag, you get "pure" heritage. If you want modern tech, look elsewhere. If you want an icon, "this is it". Alright, first impressions of the WMNS Air Jordan 1. Opening the box, that classic high-top shape is instantly recognizable. The colorway I got is super wearable. Putting them on... yeah, it's the same familiar feel: firm sole, tight around the ankle at first. They look great in motion, though - a true style icon. Stack it against a Dunk? The AJ1 has more structure, for better or worse. The clear advantage is its legendary status and versatility in any wardrobe. The downside is the comfort (or lack thereof) for long periods. Verdict? A staple for sneaker rotation, but manage your comfort expectations. Worth it at retail, maybe not huge resale. Who should "maybe" skip it? If you need all-day, walk-everywhere comfort, look at something with more modern cushioning. Also, if you have very wide feet, the standard "wmns" last might not work for you. And if you're on a tight budget? There are more comfortable options at this ~$180 price. It's an investment in style, not necessarily in comfort tech.