Unboxing it, the leather quality is decent - not "super" premium, but the stitching is clean and that iconic silhouette? It's "always" a win. Sliding them on, the fit is TTS for me. They're snug around the midfoot, which I like. The sole is firm, classic AJ1 feel, so don't expect cloud-like comfort. Honestly, if you want a versatile, stylish low-top that goes with literally everything, this $115 sneaker is a staple. Just know the break-in period is real. Opening this box, the 'Shadow' colorway is just pure class. Dark grey & black – it's subtle but powerful. On foot, the silhouette is "so" clean. It's less bulky than a Mid or High, which I love with cropped pants. The break-in is real, though – the heel might rub initially. Once molded, it's a go-to. If you want a low-maintenance, versatile sneaker that always looks sharp, this women's AJ1 Low is a top contender. My personal take? I love having a "womens air jordan 1 low" in the collection. This 'Black Toe' inspired pair is fire. They're lightweight, easy to style, and honestly, just make a fit look more put-together. Are they the most comfortable shoes I own? No. But few shoes balance iconic look and everyday function this well. If you prioritize style over cutting-edge foot-feel, you'll be happy. Just got my hands on this 'Lucky Green' "womens air jordan 1 low". The initial reaction? That green is vibrant—a really fun spring/summer option. The build quality is good for the tier. When I put them on, the toe box felt roomy—a plus for some. Compared to the OG highs, you lose some ankle support, but gain everyday convenience. Pro: It adds a pop of color without being too loud. Con: The leather might crease noticeably. Priced around "$135 USD", it's for someone who wants to stand out a bit. Not the most practical daily driver if you prefer neutrals.

  • Shown: White Oreo
  • Style: 854262-001

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5